Play chess online, board games, online games, chess clubs, chess games database, free chess online, chess games, free online chess games, chess teams, chess puzzles, chess league and more...

Tags: online chess, play chess, play chess, free chess, chess online, online chess

Chess Forum
www6conf.org << - < - > - >>

From	Message
Posted by aandersen www6conf.org 3/31/2008 05:33:10 play online chess	Subject: Help ! (with openings) Message: I’m trying to learn something about opening theory. The idea being that with a bit more knowledge, I might have some idea about where the game is going rather than being bounced around by circumstances as I seem to do now. So, I bought a book and started reading it but I’m stuck on chapter 1 verse 1. I’m looking at something called the C3 sicillian. I’m fine with the first moves (e4 c5) but then we come to C3. The author seems to set great store by this move without really explaining what is so good about it. I’m no expert (and possibly this is why I’m not getting it) but to me the move seems boring, pointless and almost gives the initiative to black at this early stage. Can anyone out there help me with this one? Yours sincerely Confused from London
Posted by lighttotheright www6conf.org 3/31/2008 07:39:05 play online chess	Message: The c3 variation is OK; but from your description, it sounds like the author may have over-hyped it. I cannot be sure of what the author stated about it, since I only have your perception from your post. To understand the move, you must understand the motive behind it. The opening is a struggle to force the play into lines that you feel comfortable playing instead of your opponent. Presumably, e4 is played because it is considered the strongest first move by many. This can sometimes be true regardless whether you like a tactical or positional style game. 1. e4 usually turns into a tactical game. 1. ... c5 turns that tactical game into one that is non-symmetrical. 2. c3 turns the game back into a more positional one. Many people don't quite understand positional play. When Black played 1. ... c5 he was not likely to have wanted to play a positional game. So, 2. c3 is good in that it goes directly against much of the intent of Black's first move. It supports a possible d4 advance, which is good in the struggle for the control of the center. You stated that c3 seems to be a wasted move; yet, the normal line with Nf3 can be considered just as wasted because the knight will be soon forced into an early second move. So, the main difference is whether you want a slug-fest or a dance. A lot of people cannot dance, so they prefer to slug it out in a tactical game. And then there are those people that consider 'boxing' as a form of dance. It can get confusing. Most people play e4 because they want tactical play. It just seems strange to some that white would abruptly change the presumptive character of the game like that. Despite this, 2. c3 is fine. It is just unusual.
Posted by schnarre www6conf.org 3/31/2008 09:11:18 play online chess	Hmmnnnnn Message: The move 2. c3 essentially forces direct confrontation by preparing a later d4 to force Black into exchanges (e.g., 2. c3 Nc6, 3.d4 cxd4, 4. cxd4--here White has the center squares), or to supplement other moves (e.g, 2. c3 Nc6, 3.Nf3 d6, 4.d4 cxd4, 5. cxd4 Bg4, 6. Bb5). To put it simply, it's the "I'm going to grind you down!" move.
Posted by marinvukusic www6conf.org 3/31/2008 10:07:19 play online chess	... Message: "The author seems to set great store by this move without really explaining what is so good about it." Exact quote would be nice. In any case this is a good opening and I would recommend putting the effort in at least first 10 pages or so (maybe author's position will become clearer from his comments).
Posted by aandersen www6conf.org 3/31/2008 12:01:07 play online chess	Message: Thank you folks for your responses. I have decided that i will carry on reading and also when i've finished some of my current crop of games, i will try to find some games where i can experiment with this. I think that pehaps some practical experience will help me to understand. Once again, thank you all.
Posted by schnarre www6conf.org 4/03/2008 15:00:13 play online chess	Message: Glad we could help mate! Good luck, & good hunting!
Posted by wschmidt www6conf.org 4/08/2008 11:55:52 play online chess	My two-bits... Message: get a book or look at a website that focuses on good opening principles rather than trying to learn the nuances of a particular line at first. There are several good books out there that talk about controling the center, piece development and pawn structure. That stuff is way more important to learn than specific lines at the 1200-1500 level.
Posted by ionadowman www6conf.org 4/08/2008 13:23:10 play online chess	Also ... Message: ... find a database that features games with this opening. Play through wins and losses (and draws). It's not a bad idea for the first few games at least just to play them through without thinking too deeply into the lines, but observing how the game shapes, and look out for motifs (tactical or strategic) that seem to recur in several games. Does the pawn structure seem pretty much the same in most games? (Yes or no). If so, what's the upshot? If not, is it because emphasis is on some other aspect of the game e.g. piece play or direct attacks on the king, say. Cheers, Ion
Chess news: Telegraph chess: Big money at stake -- Fide have announced details of six new chess tournaments which will form Grand Prix in 2008 and 2009. All will be 14 player all play alls and held at Baku (Azerbaijan), beginning April 20th 2008, Krasnoyarsk (Russia), Doha (Qatar), Montreux (Switzerland), Elista (Russia), Karlovy Vary (Czech Republic) beginning December 7th 2009. Each chess event has a prize fund of over £100,000 and there will be a Grand Prix prize fund to be divided between the participants of over £200,000. Unfortunately England’s number one Michael Adams has just missed out on automatic qualification and is first reserve. The qualifiers are: Vishy Anand, Vladimir Kramnik, Veselin Topalov, Gata Kamsky, Alexey Shirov, Magnus Carlsen, Sergei Karjakin, Vassily Ivanchuk, Shakriyar Mamedyarov, Peter Leko, Alexander Morozevich, Levon ... Telegraph chess: Whiteley shows his class -- International Master Andrew Whiteley the number one seed was a comfortable winner of the 1st English Senior Chess Championships just completed at the Izaak Walton Hotel, Dovedale in Derbyshire. This was by far the strongest individual chess tournament for Seniors, defined as over 60 in chess, held in the United Kingdom. Past British Senior chess champions; John Littlewood, Michael Cook, Roelof Westra, Norman Stephenson and George Ellison took part as did reigning joint champion David Anderton but none could challenge Whiteley, a former England international. Whiteley was one of the leading lights of the King’s Head Chess Club in its heyday when chess was played continually at the pub of the same name which was, appropriately enough, sited in Moscow Rd, Bayswater, a suburb of ... Telegraph chess: Hunt for success on Oslo -- England has accepted a Nordic Challenge and will send a representative chess team to Oslo next week to take on chess teams from Norway, Sweden and Latvia. The matches will take place over ten boards, five men and five women. The England men’s chess team will consist of four of the younger generation of GMs plus the experienced Peter Wells. Men: GM Gawain Jones 2562; GM David Howell 2528; GM Peter Wells 2520; IM Stephen Gordon 2501; GM Stewart Haslinger 2495. Women: IM Harriet Hunt 2457; Sabrina Chevannes 2074; Kanwal Bhatia 2054; Sarah Hegarty 1974; Amisha Parmar 1995. It is heartening to see Harriet Hunt playing for England again and it is your correspondent’s fervent hope that England are able to field Harriet plus Jovanka Houska and ...